Posted by: admin on: November 15, 2011
Diagnosing urinary tract infection in pediatric age group especially infants has been a challenge. Here are the guidelines of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to stream line its treatment and diagnosis.
Team@CMHF
Since the introduction of effective vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae type b and Streptococcus pneumoniae, there has been increasing recognition of the urinary tract as the frequent site of occult and serious bacterial infection in febrile infants and children. Because of the nonspecific clinical findings and inability to obtain reliable urine specimens without invasive measure, the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) may be delayed. In 1999, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) developed clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of UTIs in febrile infants and young children.
The aim of this study was to report the revisions to the AAP practice parameter regarding the diagnosis and management of initial UTIs in febrile infants and young children.
The diagnosis and management of …UTIs in young children are clinically challenging,” write S. Maria E. Finnell, MD, MS, and colleagues from the AAP Subcommittee on Urinary Tract Infection who coauthored the technical report. “This report was developed to inform the revised, evidence-based, clinical guideline regarding the diagnosis and management of initial UTIs in febrile infants and young children, 2 to 24 months of age
AAP Recommendations
Specific recommendations in the new Clinical Practice Guideline include the following:
Additional comments in response to the 5 clinical questions addressed in the guideline and technical report, include the following
Which children should have their urine tested?
How should the urine sample be obtained?
How should UTIs be treated?
What imaging and follow-up are recommended after a diagnosis of UTI?
How should children be monitored after a UTI has been diagnosed?
Clinical Implications
Leave a Reply